Basic Conceptions

The Hub aims to explain the Taxonomy and its adherence to basic scientific values. In particular, the Topics to follow:

• Explain the field of study: personal functioning, psychosocial reality and endeavour.
• Place the method of study in the context of the social sciences.
• Explain how the Taxonomy has been developed and validated.
• Delineate taxonomic forms and processes as currently understood.

The 18^th Century Age of Enlightenment finally overthrew superstition and rigid doctrine. It advocated reason and rationality as the primary sources of authority for knowledge. It is noticeable that the resultant progress led to massive technological gains, but did rather little to stop war, genocide or inhumanity.

Now the New Enlightenment of the 21^st Century is underway, with the goal of overthrowing the prevailing distrust of human experience. It advocates self-awareness and ethical reasoning. (More details.) Such reflection is the only valid means of handling personal and social issues. It alone offers the possibility of a more humane existence for all.

But we need a scientific approach. Only through a systematic and rigorous account of personal functioning can there be a solid foundation for progress. This website is part of the beginning of such a project. Being scientific, it cannot be the final word. It is part of a slow piecemeal process in which errors are removed by testing and formulations are continuously checked and refined or radically altered.

Q: What does the Taxonomy map?

A: Personal functioning in psychosocial reality.

At present, closely related ideas about the mind and personal life are spread out amongst numerous disciplines and domains in the social sciences and philosophy, and in the less formal professional literature relating to therapy, life advice and management consultancy.

Such scattering impedes any overview, and the diversity of contexts inhibits broader reflections. The end result is that particular ideas often get unnecessarily captured by a single perspective.

In the effort to synthesize and integrate, these taxonomic studies:

• directly address what it is to be a person,
• propose universal categories of conscious experience (consciousness),
• organize ideas that are mostly well-known and well-established,
• apply rigour to the intersection of experience and social life.

Much of the material in the Hub is technical or abstract. To ensure precision, taxonomic inquiry requires its own terminology. The Hub explains the needed terminology. These terms naturally sound like jargon to the uninitiated.

Jargon is kept to a minimum in the posted Frameworks. However, some is unavoidable. The meaning can be immediately clarified by clicking on the Terms tab at the top of the left-hand column, and clicking on the problematic term. For further details, return to the Hub.

These scientific studies cannot be ethically neutral. They must assume and require personal autonomy and the acceptance of responsibility, as hand-maidens of reflective awareness.

The Taxonomy and its Frameworks are unavoidably constructed out of words and should be viewed as a «structure of meanings». These specify how psychosocial reality can and should be constructed and maintained.

The ethical challenge posed by this body of work is whether the structures with their meanings:

► are practical &/or useful
► are judged as «good» &/or «right»
► feel natural (i.e. intrinsic to the human condition)
as well as being
► coherent, consistent and testable.

This can only be determined if you explore the various Satellites in a receptive, curious and open-minded way. Your readiness to reflect, discuss and re-think will bring the ideas alive.